On 10 June 2010 07:50, Thomas Martitz
wrote:
> Am 04.06.2010 03:27, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>
> Yep, and I wasn't interested in multi instance either until I realised
> that it allows me to have Geany on multiple screens, I do lot of
> switching back and forth between .hpp and .cpp files so showing
Am 04.06.2010 03:27, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Yep, and I wasn't interested in multi instance either until I realised
that it allows me to have Geany on multiple screens, I do lot of
switching back and forth between .hpp and .cpp files so showing them
both would be a*big* help.
How about a proper
2010/6/3 Enrico Tröger :
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:43:54 +0400, Eugene wrote:
>
>> > > > > Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
>> > > > > preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
>> > > > > after Preferences dialog is closed, this option wouldn't do
>> > >
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:43:54 +0400, Eugene wrote:
> > > > > Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
> > > > > preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
> > > > > after Preferences dialog is closed, this option wouldn't do
> > > > > any harm. Or would it?
> > >
On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:36:14 +0200%
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 22:52:49 +0400, Eugene wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
> sorry for the delay, I just don't manage to keep up with this
> stuff :(.
>
No problem.
>
> > > > Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
> > > > pre
On Thu, 20 May 2010 22:52:49 +0400, Eugene wrote:
Hey,
sorry for the delay, I just don't manage to keep up with this stuff :(.
> > > Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
> > > preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
> > > after Preferences dialog is c
On Wed, 19 May 2010 23:05:26 +0200%
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400, Eugene wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:09:57 +0300%
> > Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
> > > Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now committed, together wit
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
> preferences when closing.
I second that.
> As preferences are saved immediately after Preferences dialog is
> closed, this option wouldn't do any harm. Or would it?
If you thi
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400, Eugene wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:09:57 +0300%
> Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
> > Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >
> > > Now committed, together with "Tools > Save configuration" menu
> > > item.
> >
> > I hope "Save configu
On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:09:57 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > Now committed, together with "Tools > Save configuration" menu item.
>
> I hope "Save configuration" works for all instances, and not for the
> "main" instance only, as
On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:31 +0300%
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> > > Lex Trotman wrote:
> > >
> > > > If so then I assume all Geany commands
> > > > without the -i will be the same instance, and this is the one
> > > > that should be a
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:31 +0300%
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:08:18 +%
> Nick Treleaven wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > > > To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main
> > > > instance should save settings.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:21:43 +1100, Lex wrote:
>2010/3/1 Enrico Tröger
>
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
>> >Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all.
>> >>
>> >> When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
>> >> h
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:17:03 +0100, Thomas wrote:
>On 05.03.2010 22:49, Dominic Hopf wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 16:54 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
>>> Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> (If a second instance of geany is run without
On 05.03.2010 22:49, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 16:54 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is implied).
I really lik
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 16:54 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
> Thomas Martitz wrote:
>
> > >> (If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
> > >> first, -i is implied).
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I really like this idea. It is simpl
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> >> (If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
> >> first, -i is implied).
> >>
> >>
> > I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
> > convenient and uniform with the behaviour of "new-in
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100%
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >> (If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to
> >> the first, -i is implied).
> >>
> >>
> > I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
> > conve
On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is implied).
I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
convenient and uniform with the behaviour of "new-instances", i.e.,
those instances should
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100%
Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> As I implied in my comment on another message, my use case was to
> have the filemanager programmed to start a new instance if I double
> click to look at a file so it doesn't interfere with my "main"
> instance. I know the socket system
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:08:18 +%
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> > > To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main
> > > instance should save settings. We could have a Tools->Save Config
> > > menu item enabled for the first ins
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main instance
> > should save settings. We could have a Tools->Save Config menu item
> > enabled for the first instance to allow the user to restart other
> > instances with the new set
2010/3/1 Enrico Tröger
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
> >Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
> >> high possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily o
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
>Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
>> high possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my
>> machine, using either trunk or SM
Lex,
Now I understand--thanks very much for the clarification!
Randy Kramer
On Friday 26 February 2010 05:31:09 pm Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 27 February 2010 03:36, Randy Kramer wrote:
> > I haven't paid careful attention to this thread, but on several
> > projects I've worked on, we've adopted a
On 27 February 2010 03:36, Randy Kramer wrote:
> I haven't paid careful attention to this thread, but on several projects
> I've worked on, we've adopted a "last to save, wins" philosophy for
> situations (somewhat) similar to this.
>
> I've learned to deal with that in several applications inclu
On 27 February 2010 02:15, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a high
> > possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my machine,
> > using either trun
I haven't paid careful attention to this thread, but on several projects
I've worked on, we've adopted a "last to save, wins" philosophy for
situations (somewhat) similar to this.
I've learned to deal with that in several applications including nedit,
and it seems to be a reasonable approach, r
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a high
> possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my machine,
> using either trunk or SM version.
>
> To reproduce: open three instances of gean
29 matches
Mail list logo
