On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 15:26:09 +0300
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 11:09:28 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > > I think G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR | G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK should be
> > > replaced with G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR.
> >
> > Yes indeed. The or doesn't seem to make big sense here
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 11:09:28 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > I think G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR | G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK should be
> > replaced with G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR.
>
> Yes indeed. The or doesn't seem to make big sense here.
Here is a patch then.
--
E-gards: Jimmy
--- ./src/editor.c.orig 201
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:03:44 +0300
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In geany, there are a few checks of the type:
>
> g_file_test(, G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR |
> G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK)
>
> which presumably check if is a regular file, or a symlink to
> one. However, G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR follows
Hi,
In geany, there are a few checks of the type:
g_file_test(, G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR |
G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK)
which presumably check if is a regular file, or a symlink to
one. However, G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR follows symlinks and is
enough for the test, while G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK (and conse
