On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:25:42 +, Nick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:33:55 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:03:53 +0100, Dominic wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 13:03 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:36 +0100
Enrico
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:09:42 +0100, Enrico wrote:
Either we push into trunk and see how it works or in case we
are close to a release, I'd push it into a branch for the
curious people.
I think it would be best to put it in an 'unstable' branch. Last
time we updated Scintilla just
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:33:55 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:03:53 +0100, Dominic wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 13:03 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:36 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
Do we
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:36 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
Do we plan to update scintilla anytime soon? If not, would it be
Nick?
Any release plans soon?
Yes, I think we could make the 0.20 release soon. If there are no
i18n string changes to add we could start the
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:03:46 +
Nick Treleaven nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
possible to apply a small (7 lines) change from scintilla r3465, which
speeds up the rectangular selection about 20 times? It's perfectly
compatible with our revision.
Depends on we update Scintilla
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 13:03 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:36 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
Do we plan to update scintilla anytime soon? If not, would it be
Nick?
Any release plans soon?
Yes, I think we could make the 0.20 release
