Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:05:30 -0800 Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:13 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 10.01.2012 23:46, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 01/07/2012 07:20 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. +1 Whether paid or volunteer, it's still Maintained. I suggest dropping the Paid status altogether if no one has used it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. I disagree. Currently there might be no plugin maintainer being paid to work on a plugin, but: - this might change (...) - is something user should be able to see to resynch there demandings with reality. Hehehe, well said. OK, it's not a big deal, though I still feel it's not very useful for Geany-Plugins. Well, I will purge it for the meanwhile. We can add it once it comes back up again. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgp3xlRoFRnD0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Am 12.01.2012 04:05, schrieb Matthew Brush: You aren't kidding! I was reading a bug report[1] on Pidgin's tracker a while back about the auto-sizing of a text box or something and the tone was absolutely incredible, including demands, threats, name-calling and much more. I couldn't work on a project like Pidgin with so many disrespectful users. Yepp. And also disrespectful companies. E.g. it seems a bit like Oracle and a couple of others are using Pidgin somewhere internally (which is good for sure), but looks a bit like they are communicating: ask @support mailing list ... But we are changing topics ;D Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Am 10.01.2012 23:46, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 01/07/2012 07:20 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. +1 Whether paid or volunteer, it's still Maintained. I suggest dropping the Paid status altogether if no one has used it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. I disagree. Currently there might be no plugin maintainer being paid to work on a plugin, but: - this might change (...) - is something user should be able to see to resynch there demandings with reality. I'm reading e.g. support@pidgin mailing list and more than once a week I need to facepalm myself because of users don't understand they are not talking to some paid support. I really don't want to end up on Geany with such situation. Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Hi I suggest dropping the Paid status altogether if no one has used it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. I disagree. Currently there might be no plugin maintainer being paid to work on a plugin, but: - this might change (...) - is something user should be able to see to resynch there demandings with reality. I'm reading e.g. support@pidgin mailing list and more than once a week I need to facepalm myself because of users don't understand they are not talking to some paid support. I really don't want to end up on Geany with such situation. Even if someone is paid, he will probably be paid to do something that person that is paying want (feature, bug fix), not helping random people with support. But such status will just make someone say something like: Hey, you are being paid, DO AS I WANT AT ONCE!!! -- Best regards, Yury Siamashka ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On 01/11/2012 05:13 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 10.01.2012 23:46, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 01/07/2012 07:20 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. +1 Whether paid or volunteer, it's still Maintained. I suggest dropping the Paid status altogether if no one has used it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. I disagree. Currently there might be no plugin maintainer being paid to work on a plugin, but: - this might change (...) - is something user should be able to see to resynch there demandings with reality. Hehehe, well said. OK, it's not a big deal, though I still feel it's not very useful for Geany-Plugins. I'm reading e.g. support@pidgin mailing list and more than once a week I need to facepalm myself because of users don't understand they are not talking to some paid support. I really don't want to end up on Geany with such situation. You aren't kidding! I was reading a bug report[1] on Pidgin's tracker a while back about the auto-sizing of a text box or something and the tone was absolutely incredible, including demands, threats, name-calling and much more. I couldn't work on a project like Pidgin with so many disrespectful users. Cheers, Matthew Brush [1] I think it was: http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/4986 ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On 01/07/2012 07:20 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. +1 Whether paid or volunteer, it's still Maintained. I suggest dropping the Paid status altogether if no one has used it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On 07/01/12 17:53, Eugene Arshinov wrote: On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:34:03 +0100 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: Am 07.01.2012 17:34, schrieb Eugene Arshinov: Hi. Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine) I suggest you to use git format-patch, as to preserve author and commit message information. Probably not a big deal for this one though. Best regards. Thanks for the suggestion! The updated patch is attached. And now committed. Thanks. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgpYT2is6fZNZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of supported to maintained. I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. Cheers, Colomban ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:29:30 +0100 Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: Hi folks, We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief instructions to do so. Hi. Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine) -- Best regards, Eugene.diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index f5f0d26..684dd74 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ W: http://plugins.geany.org/webhelper.html S: Supported xmlsnippets -P: -M: -W: -S: +P: Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com +M: Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com +W: http://plugins.geany.org/xmlsnippets.html +S: Maintained ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Am 07.01.2012 17:34, schrieb Eugene Arshinov: Hi. Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine) I suggest you to use git format-patch, as to preserve author and commit message information. Probably not a big deal for this one though. Best regards. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Hi folks, We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief instructions to do so. Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
Le 06/01/2012 10:29, Frank Lanitz a écrit : Hi folks, We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief instructions to do so. Oops sorry, I completely forgot to do it myself. Now done. Just a few questions: * What's the exact difference between P and M? Do we really expect to have a maintainer but somebody else that deals with the patches? * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). Cheers, Colomban ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:29:30 +0100 Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own [...] Here's a patch. -- E-gards: Jimmy From 210845809a50b43a1c052ace25cdb365b4f923a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:48:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Added myself as maintainer of geanyextrasel and geanyinsertnum --- MAINTAINERS | 16 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index b271549..6219dd7 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ W: S: geanyextrasel -P: -M: -W: -S: +P: Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com +M: Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com +W: http://sheckley.users.sourceforge.net +S: Supported geanygdb P: Dominic Hopf @@ -61,10 +61,10 @@ W: http://plugins.geany.org/geanygendoc.html S: Supported geanyinsertnum -P: -M: -W: -S: +P: Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com +M: Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com +W: http://sheckley.users.sourceforge.net +S: Supported geanylatex P: Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de -- 1.7.7.3 ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 19:52 +0200, Dimitar Zhekov wrote: On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:29:30 +0100 Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own [...] Here's a patch. Applied, thanks. :) -- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:15:32 +0100 Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote: Le 06/01/2012 10:29, Frank Lanitz a écrit : Hi folks, We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief instructions to do so. Oops sorry, I completely forgot to do it myself. Now done. Just a few questions: * What's the exact difference between P and M? Do we really expect to have a maintainer but somebody else that deals with the patches? Well... maybe the maintainer likes to get the patches sent to a team or a mailing list. * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained? The only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgph7zgiPH5OE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
