Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I noticed one little weird thing: after starting Geany

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/18/2011 08:29 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/18/2011 08:29 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-13 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling: g_malloc0_n wasn't found inside libglib-2.0-0.dll.

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 13.12.2011 07:22, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:27 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 13.12.2011 07:22, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-31 Thread Nick Treleaven
On 19/10/2011 08:47, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-19 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not normally change, but it seems the owner

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-18 09:05 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 18/10/2011 00:09, Matthew Brush wrote: I didn't want to break all the existing code in core and plugins that were using ui_lookup_widget/ui_hookup_widget() functions, so I dropped the (now) pointless first parameter. There's no need to associate

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-18 01:33 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: Not really (I'm kinda stupid remember :) I think I'm confused about how it used to work and you're confused about how it works now :) I think I see what you're talking about, ui_hookup_widget() is attaching the widget to the owner Gobject's

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not normally change, but it seems the owner

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 04:09 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not