This commit introduces 'gnetlist:get-all-package-attributes' to
retrieve every first attribute value for package consisting of
multiple symbol instances.
'gnetlist:get-package-attribute' gets redefined to use the above
procedure. To preserve backward compatibility, it returns the first
value
Slot attributes have different values across symbol instances of a same
package. But 'gnetlist:get-package-attribute' does not like that. So the
value has to get directly extracted from the list returned by
'gnetlist:get-all-package-attributes'.
---
gnetlist/scheme/gnet-drc2.scm |4 +++-
1
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com writes:
On 01/02/2011 04:14 PM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
If you do not use it, why do you care about associating
netnames to traces?
That's not about auto DRC enforce drawing, it's about searching
for parts related to schematic and cross probing
and
Dan White d...@whiteaudio.com writes:
gnetlist: Option sort_port_value sorts spice-IO devs by value=.
SF: 3150019
This allows using the refdes' to indicate pinlabel and then using
value= to yield a meaningful ordering to a subckt's ports. My symbol
generator script uses the refdes for
On Monday 03 January 2011 07.19:46 Dan White wrote:
gnetlist: makedepend backend
SF: 3150021
Gnetlist backend to determine a schematic's dependencies. Output
is in the form of:
source.sch: depend1.sch depend2.sch
source.cir: source.sch depend1.cir depend2.cir other.inc
...written to
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
gnetlist: Option sort_port_value sorts spice-IO devs by value=.
SF: 3150019
This allows using the refdes' to indicate pinlabel and then using
value= to yield a meaningful ordering to a subckt's ports. My
symbol
generator script uses the refdes for pinlabel, order
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:24 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote:
+1
Please don't introduce additional road blocks to double purpose
schematics for pcb and simulation.
I wonder if slotdef in a symbol is a good thing at all.
If I place an OpAmp in a schematic -- should I decide for dual or quad
Stefan Salewski wrote:
I wonder if slotdef in a symbol is a good thing at all.
If I place an OpAmp in a schematic -- should I decide for dual or
quad really at this moment? Or better later in the PCB layout
process.
Without this information gnetlist cannot produce a valid netlist.
I'd
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:50 AM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
Stefan Salewski wrote:
I wonder if slotdef in a symbol is a good thing at all.
If I place an OpAmp in a schematic -- should I decide for dual or
quad really at this moment? Or better later in the PCB layout
process.
Without this
I guess all this was discussed on the list multiple times in the past,
so this is more a note to myself...
I think it may be useful to have two types of symbols, soft and hard.
Hard symbols have an footprint attribute and maybe additional hard
properties. Soft symbols are simple an OpAmp or a
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes:
I guess all this was discussed on the list multiple times in the past,
My thoughts: http://www.delorie.com/pcb/component-dbs.html
You should be able to defer the selection of packages, pinouts, and part
numbers until later in the design cycle.
On Jan 3, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com writes:
On 01/02/2011 04:14 PM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
If you do not use it, why do you care about associating
netnames to traces?
That's not about auto DRC enforce drawing, it's about searching
I am trying to use the generic-power.sym in my schematic. I am
setting the net attribute to 5VA (for 5V analog). I was hoping this
would make all the nets with such a symbol. When I try to run gnetlist
with the spice-sdb backend I get this error printing out several times.
Got an
On Jan 3, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
I am trying to use the generic-power.sym in my schematic. I am
setting the net attribute to 5VA (for 5V analog). I was hoping this
would make all the nets with such a symbol. When I try to run gnetlist
with the spice-sdb backend
I have defined my diode with a model statement
model=Is=1e-22 Rs=6 N=1.5 Cjo=50p Iave=20m Vpk=5 type=LED
This works fine except the spice-sdb backend inserts a model statement
every time it finds one of the diodes. Is there a way to have the
model statement only once.
Oliver
Den 2011-01-03 23:37:23 skrev John Doty j...@noqsi.com:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
I am trying to use the generic-power.sym in my schematic. I am
setting the net attribute to 5VA (for 5V analog). I was hoping this
would make all the nets with such a symbol.
Different places have different standards, but it is not that uncommon
to use the Blah Blah A designation in some form to indicate an analog
supply as opposed to a digital supply. If you really want to get folks
frothing about conventions, just bring up the split ground planes vs
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:52:12 +0100
Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knugum-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Den 2011-01-03 23:37:23 skrev John Doty j...@noqsi.com:
[...]
A bit off topic, but is it recommended to call something ”5VA” in
this case? Couldn't it be confused with the
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I guess all this was discussed on the list multiple times in the past,
so this is more a note to myself...
I think it may be useful to have two types of symbols, soft and hard.
Hard symbols have an footprint attribute and maybe additional
Adding the NoConnection DRC attribute to a net causes the drc2 backend
to ignore it when checking for unconnected nets. However, drc2
currently doesn't enforce that the net is actually unconnected. It's
possible to mark two pins as NoConnection and then accidentally wire
them together. This
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
I found it annoying that I need to click through the whole
component tree after filtering the symbol file names.
+1
Every click that can be avoided for common tasks adds to the
productivity. I hope, this patch will be accepted.
---)kaimartin(---
--
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:04 -0800, Edward Hennessy wrote:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I guess all this was discussed on the list multiple times in the past,
so this is more a note to myself...
I think it may be useful to have two types of symbols, soft and hard.
From: m...@ssalewski.de
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:17:21 +0100
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Soft and Hard symbols
At least the slotdef attribute is an example where we currently have
to
make a decision in an very early design stage. If I
FYI I pushed the patch to gpleda; update your git and build. Also, the
'v' key now centers the board in the window rather than place it at the
upper left corner (as well as making it best-fit the window, as before).
___
geda-user mailing list
24 matches
Mail list logo
