On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 04:37 PM, Mario Klebsch wrote:
I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless.
JG
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote:
The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure
about the T and L.
But what about VQFP ?
"Very-proprietarily-named Quad Flat P
Hi!
Am Dienstag, 26.08.03 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb John Griessen:
I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless.
JG
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote:
The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure
about the T and L.
But what about VQFP ?
73, Mario
--
Mario Klebsch
The Philips datasheet for the P89C66x microcontroller family lists
them as being available in an LQFP package. It calls this a "Low Quad
Flat Pack". A tray of those chips just arrived here, and they do have
leads.
Indeed, the package is identical to a Xilinx XC9536 CPLD (handy,
they're g
Umm, which netlister are you using, and which version of gnetlist?
If you are using gEDA20030525 (the most recent) you should netlist by saying:
gnetlist -g spice-sdb -o Spicefilename.cir Schematicname.sch
Also, it may help if you place the full pathname to your model file
into the file attribut
When i created the netlist of my circuit with gschem, i have an error
message "ERROR:In procedure string-ref:and ERROR: Argument out of range:
0". i use the amplifier lm741 and in edit attributes i wrotte
refdes
X1
model-name
lm741
file
lm741.mod
value
lm741
I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless.
JG
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote:
> The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure
> about the T and L.
>
> Thanks for your help and attention.
>
> -Dan
--
John GriessenCibolo Design Austin Texas
EE good at IR s
Hi,
I've been going over a patch submitted to pcb by Wojciech Kazubski that
supplies several additions to the QFP family of footprints.
I would like to incorporate these changes, but would like to discuss
some naming conventions here first. One goal I have is to make sure
what ever decisions ar
