Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-28 Thread Bob Paddock
But what about VQFP ? Here is one that explains some of the newer ones like QFN. Has some good tips on soldering and solder masks: http://focus.ti.com/docs/apps/catalog/resources/appnoteabstract.jhtml?abstractName=slua271 Download .pdf (slua271.pdf, 166 Kbytes) (Requires Acrobat Reader 4.x)

Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-27 Thread Dave McGuire
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 04:37 PM, Mario Klebsch wrote: I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless. JG On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote: The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure about the T and L. But what about VQFP ? Very-proprietarily-named Quad Flat

Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-27 Thread Mario Klebsch
Hi! Am Dienstag, 26.08.03 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb John Griessen: I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless. JG On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote: The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure about the T and L. But what about VQFP ? 73, Mario -- Mario Klebsch

Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-26 Thread John Griessen
I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless. JG On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote: The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure about the T and L. Thanks for your help and attention. -Dan -- John GriessenCibolo Design Austin Texas EE good at IR

Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-26 Thread Dave McGuire
The Philips datasheet for the P89C66x microcontroller family lists them as being available in an LQFP package. It calls this a Low Quad Flat Pack. A tray of those chips just arrived here, and they do have leads. Indeed, the package is identical to a Xilinx XC9536 CPLD (handy, they're

gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

2003-08-26 Thread Dan McMahill
Hi, I've been going over a patch submitted to pcb by Wojciech Kazubski that supplies several additions to the QFP family of footprints. I would like to incorporate these changes, but would like to discuss some naming conventions here first. One goal I have is to make sure what ever decisions