Re: [geeklog-users] Static URLs

2003-01-05 Thread Tony Bibbs
This has come up a number of times in the past. Searching the lists won't help since we couldn't bring them over from SourceForge. This has been a bit of a thorny issue. We haven't tackled this problem to-date because there didn't seem to be a good way to support this for both windows and u

[geeklog-users] Static URLs

2003-01-05 Thread dwight
I've searched the lists and geeklog.net and haven't found a sufficient answer. Is there a way to have the URLs not have parameters in them? This would help search engine results. I did see something about a switch to enable this but I can't find it. I'm new to geeklog and trying to see if it will

Re: [geeklog-users] Much ado about nothing?

2003-01-05 Thread Dirk Haun
Peter Hopfgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1) Which developments are currently happenening? I don't know. You keep >it for yourself. I mean, I have some responsibility for my customers and >I have to take some decisions for what they will have in some months. We have a list of bugs and feature

Re: [geeklog-users] Much ado about nothing?

2003-01-05 Thread Tony Bibbs
Peter Hopfgartner wrote: Well, I have to decide for a blog to support for several installations. Geeklog looks good, but: 1) Which developments are currently happenening? I don't know. You keep it for yourself. I mean, I have some responsibility for my customers and I have to take some decisions

Re: [geeklog-users] Much ado about nothing?

2003-01-05 Thread Peter Hopfgartner
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 16:48, Dirk Haun wrote: > First of all, I have to say that a few people have blown this completely > out of proportion. I mean, it's not that we're discussing our secret > plans for world domination in there or something. Take, for example, that > comment on the current poll