Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2005-01-04 Thread Robin Bowes
Doc Radium wrote: Have you tried disabling the BBC rdf feed and the gallery random photo block and compared page generation times? Yes. It didn't make much difference. One thing I haven't tried is temporarily disabling the code that inserts images from Gallery inline in my stories. I suspect

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2005-01-04 Thread Doc Radium
Have you tried disabling the BBC rdf feed and the gallery random photo block and compared page generation times? On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:08:39 -0600, Tony Bibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The network connection has a measurable impact, however, the page > creation times have nothing to do with n

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2005-01-04 Thread Tony Bibbs
The network connection has a measurable impact, however, the page creation times have nothing to do with networking. So while you point out a good issue, the script execution is still an issue. --Tony MAC OS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've looked at your site a couple of times over the l

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2005-01-03 Thread Vincent Furia
Robin, There may be some tweaking that needs to be done in your configuration. I have a PII-300 with 384MB of RAM and I rarely see a page load over 1.25 seconds (and average load time is about 0.9 seconds). Another possibility, if you run a lot of other software on your machine (such as X-Window

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2005-01-03 Thread Robin Bowes
MAC OS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've looked at your site a couple of times over the last couple of days and from what I can see, your link is just slow, I don't think you'll speed it up a lot by changing anything related to PHP, MySQL or even Geeklog! Your network connection is slow. Hi

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2004-12-31 Thread Dirk Haun
Another issue to consider is the outbreak of the new variant of the Santy worm (also known as PhpInclude worm or Spyki) which is now attacking all PHP scripts (not just phpBB). Check your logfiles for unusually long requests, often with "LWP::Simple" as the user agent. This can slow down a site c

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2004-12-31 Thread MAC OS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I've looked at your site a couple of times over the last couple of days and from what I can see, your link is just slow, I don't think you'll speed it up a lot by changing anything related to PHP, MySQL or even Geeklog! Your network connection is slow. From Belgium: traceroute to robinb

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2004-12-30 Thread Robin Bowes
Tony Bibbs wrote: Most of the load is, undoubtedly, on the database. Do you have MySQL's query cache feature enabled and optimally configured? I'd start there. Tony, I'm already using turck-mmcache but not cached queries. I turned on cached queries and didn't see any noticeable speed up.

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2004-12-29 Thread Vincent Furia
Just a side note, we really should contact the groklaw.net folks and try to figure out which (if any) of the changes they made to speed up groklaw.net are implementable in geeklog. I'm sure they have at least a few tricks for speeding things up. -Vinny On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:17:34 -0600, Tony B

Re: [geeklog-users] geeklog performance

2004-12-29 Thread Tony Bibbs
Most of the load is, undoubtedly, on the database. Do you have MySQL's query cache feature enabled and optimally configured? I'd start there. I'd also strongly encourage using a php accelerator like APC: http://pecl.php.net/package/APC I'm hoping you aren't doing either of those yet and if