Re: [Geeqie-devel] On refcounting

2011-05-07 Thread Omari Stephens
On 05/07/2011 09:20 AM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote: > Hi, > > On St 4. května 2011, Omari Stephens wrote: >> Howdy, all >> >> I'm poking around with the marks code. Currently, marks are _really >> slow_ when you connect at least one mark to an image tag — when an image >> with no marks drops to zero

Re: [Geeqie-devel] On refcounting

2011-05-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 7 May 2011 11:41:00 +0200, VN wrote: > > FWIW, and considering that the current refcounting in Geeqie is > > troublesome, you've got my blessing. :-) I'm all for a central list of > > the current directory's file data objects, with added maintenance > > structures on top of that. > > What

Re: [Geeqie-devel] On refcounting

2011-05-07 Thread Vladimir Nadvornik
On Čt 5. května 2011, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 04 May 2011 16:30:44 +, OS wrote: > > > That said, I imagine that we'd be better off just always holding a ref > > for every FileData in the current directory. On my machine, a FileData > > is 176 bytes and a GList is 24 bytes, so for

Re: [Geeqie-devel] On refcounting

2011-05-07 Thread Vladimir Nadvornik
Hi, On St 4. května 2011, Omari Stephens wrote: > Howdy, all > > I'm poking around with the marks code. Currently, marks are _really > slow_ when you connect at least one mark to an image tag — when an image > with no marks drops to zero refs, we lose track of what marks it may > have, and on