>Currently I tend to keep the ifdef way. But the private function name
>space has some potential and some elegances. I don't see a way at all in
>different branches. Long term that is not manageable.
>
>On the other hand, if GTK3 gets to a usable state, I would vote to drop
>GTK2. But I don't see t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Colin,
Am So den 3. Jul 2016 um 18:39 schrieb Colin Clark:
> I am somewhat lost in understanding how this kind of development works
> (I only worked on embedded micros - very different).
Well, it works how it is best to archive. :-) If somethi
Colin Clark writes:
> What is the typical arrangement for development of an application that
> compiles on both GTK2 and GTK3? Is it standard to maintain two separate
> development trees?
Generally, one or the other is enabld via something like autoconf and
there are ifdefs when necessary, wi
Hi Klaus
I am somewhat lost in understanding how this kind of development works
(I only worked on embedded micros - very different).
What is the typical arrangement for development of an application that
compiles on both GTK2 and GTK3? Is it standard to maintain two separate
development trees?
