On 08/18/2012 09:14 PM, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Would there be any point in trying to utilize an existing photo DB ...
> for instance tying into Darktable?
Perhaps, but DT definitely isn't a good option, unless they want to
refactor.
DT's image cache format is still really unstable (in the se
Would there be any point in trying to utilize an existing photo DB ...
for instance tying into Darktable?
David
On 12-08-17 09:20 AM, Uwe Ohse wrote:
> That certainly needs some kind of database. I remember some discussions
> on that, has there some kind of consensus been achieved?
> I'd persona
On Friday, August 17, 2012 06:20:28 PM Uwe Ohse wrote:
> > - sorting by exif date (this will requiure some sort of metadata
> > caching)
>
> That certainly needs some kind of database. I remember some discussions
> on that, has there some kind of consensus been achieved?
> I'd personally like some
Hi Vlad,
thanks for the links. as you suggested, i am gonna work on a demo for this
and see what other features can be implemented
--Vinit
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> On Friday, August 17, 2012 01:56:18 AM vinit agrawal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking of,
On Friday, August 17, 2012 01:56:18 AM vinit agrawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking of, as i mentioned earlier sometime that a feature like
> seemless image viewing mode will be very cool thing to add.
> The inspiration is of course the google picasa viewer for windows, with a
> dimmed backgroun
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:10:08PM +0200, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
one possibly heretical suggestion: video view.
These days most digital cameras have some kind of video function.
> - sorting by exif date (this will requiure some sort of metadata caching)
That certainly needs some kind of datab
Hi Omari,
watch this video at 2:30 minute
http://vimeo.com/22956656
if you have windows on your machine or on a VM you can also try it.
The point is not to copy this interface but to extend it.
--Vinit
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 08:26 PM, vinit agr
On 08/16/2012 08:26 PM, vinit agrawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking of, as i mentioned earlier sometime that a feature like
> seemless image viewing mode will be very cool thing to add.
> The inspiration is of course the google picasa viewer for windows, with
> a dimmed background of the running
Hi,
I was thinking of, as i mentioned earlier sometime that a feature like
seemless image viewing mode will be very cool thing to add.
The inspiration is of course the google picasa viewer for windows, with a
dimmed background of the running windows and upfront will be the image.
But, a lot more
Dne čtvrtek 16 Srpen 2012 17:46:37 Omari Stephens napsal(a):
> On 08/16/2012 03:07 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 07:38:25 AM David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> >> Is there an established goal, or set of goals, for Geeqie? If so where
> >> will I find them.
> >> If the di
On 08/16/2012 03:07 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 07:38:25 AM David Vincent-Jones wrote:
>> Is there an established goal, or set of goals, for Geeqie? If so where
>> will I find them.
>> If the direction is already clearly stated somewhere it should be much
>> easier
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 07:38:25 AM David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Is there an established goal, or set of goals, for Geeqie? If so where
> will I find them.
> If the direction is already clearly stated somewhere it should be much
> easier to prioritize the next development.
>
Main goal is to
Is there an established goal, or set of goals, for Geeqie? If so where
will I find them.
If the direction is already clearly stated somewhere it should be much
easier to prioritize the next development.
David
--
Live
Dne středa 15 Srpen 2012 01:32:13 Greg Troxel napsal(a):
> Two thoughts:
>
> newer libchamplain? pkgsrc has 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and it seems
> libchamplain has poor API stability. But still moving to the current
> stable release seems like a good idea. Or perhaps there are other
> map widge
Two thoughts:
newer libchamplain? pkgsrc has 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and it seems
libchamplain has poor API stability. But still moving to the current
stable release seems like a good idea. Or perhaps there are other
map widgets instead.
I'm fine with dropping gtk older than 2.24, and certa
Dne pondělí 13 Srpen 2012 21:44:28 Omari Stephens napsal(a):
> > Today I will push my Gtk3 code to master. It compiles and mostly works
> > for me with gtk 2.24 and 3.2. Porting to older versions is possible but
> > I'd like to drop support for too old versions, to make the code better
> > readable
On 08/13/2012 09:32 PM, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
>
> On 12-08-13 01:58 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
>> 16bit is necessary for editing.
> Is there serious interest in *editing* in Geeqie?
Not that I'm aware of; I'm pretty sure Vlad was merely contradicting my
suggestion (and successfully).
> M
Dne pondělí 13 Srpen 2012 23:32:42 David Vincent-Jones napsal(a):
> On 12-08-13 01:58 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> > 16bit is necessary for editing.
>
> Is there serious interest in *editing* in Geeqie?
No, except for integration with external editors.
> My concern would be the facility for
On 12-08-13 01:58 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> 16bit is necessary for editing.
Is there serious interest in *editing* in Geeqie?
My concern would be the facility for exporting to print with the full 16
bit capability.
David
---
On Monday, August 13, 2012 07:44:28 PM Omari Stephens wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 06:10 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now, after 1.1 release it is time to focus on next development.
> >
> > As I wrote earlier, the next release will be 2.0. The main change will
> > be Gtk3 port, whi
On 08/13/2012 06:10 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now, after 1.1 release it is time to focus on next development.
>
> As I wrote earlier, the next release will be 2.0. The main change will be Gtk3
> port, which I have mostly done.
>
> I also want to implement this:
>
> - GPU based sca
On st 18. listopadu 2009, Omari Stephens wrote:
> Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> ::snip? SNIP!::
> ::
> >> Yes, i agree, 1.0 should be released. What is missing for that ?
> >
> > I thought we could improve the documentation first, but I agree that it
> > is not a showstopper.
> >
> > I have also most
Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
>> Yes, i agree, 1.0 should be released. What is missing for that ?
>>
> I thought we could improve the documentation first, but I agree that it is
> not
> a showstopper.
>
> I have also mostly implemented a script for converting the wiki to docbook
> a
Hi,
I didn't have much time for geeqie recently, sorry.
On Sunday 15 November 2009 14:30:53 Laurent Monin wrote:
> Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > what do you think about releasing the first version? At the moment the
> > string freeze is preventing all new implementations. Sure, I have my
Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> what do you think about releasing the first version? At the moment the
> string freeze is preventing all new implementations. Sure, I have my own
> versions in a git repository but putting them in a heavy weight SVN
> Branch would be no real help as that would make
25 matches
Mail list logo
