[Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-02-26 Thread Alexander Antimonov
Hello! I could have missed it but i do not see any ability to view/edit JPEG/PNG image comments. Which is good to have in Geeqie, i think. At least viewing. Geeqie already uses libexiv2, so adding this feature should be mostly UI job. For example, it can be implemented as an enhancement of the Im

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-02-26 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:34 -0800, Jack Craig wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > I find that opening the info pane shows a comments box. > add/update works if you click the lower right metadata icon. > > it works for me, how about you? > > hth, jackc... > Yes, I saw this pane. But the comments entered

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-03-20 Thread Alexander Antimonov
As no one of the Geeqie developers have even a word about implementing "JPEG comments", I guess, they are not (much) interested in doing this. And now, I am going to implement that. -- This SF email is sponsosred by: T

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-03-22 Thread Alexander Antimonov
Hi Klaus, On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:16 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hi Alexander, > I do not see the point. You still can have all kind of exiv stuff, also > comments, in the side pannel. Just drag and drop it from the exif pannel > or enter it by hand. What is wrong with this way? > > Gruß >K

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-03-24 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 23:31 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > I can not follow your argumentation. First you say that resaving a > image might be dangerous and than you mention that you would like to > have jpeg comment editing in geeqie. Resaving an image might be dangerous wit

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

2012-03-24 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 15:52 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > By "JPEG comment" I mean a text saved in JPEG image segment, the one > > with "COM" marker. Again, I have probably missed it, but I did not find > > how to do that with Geeqie. > > Now I have it. It is true that libexiv2 that geeqie is usi

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Consider adding an "Up" button

2013-09-15 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Am So den 15. Sep 2013 um 0:31 schrieb Jeffery Small: > [Sensless add] >> Who is adding these obnoxious ads? Is Sourceforge responsible, or someone >> else? > > I think, that is the new policy of sourceforge; to make money out of > free soft

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

2016-12-24 Thread Alexander Antimonov
Hi, I could take part in porting Geeqie to C++1x if it is decided to do so. I've been using different kinds of C++ (98/2003/201x) for more than 10 years. I believe the fundamental thing why C++ is better than C is C++ destructor and all the automatic actions that can be taken in it. It is very con

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

2016-12-24 Thread Alexander Antimonov
> We should have a good expectation of improving life for our users ... Users are important, but with such move we could improve developers' life at least. > - Introduce new bugs (because big rewrites always do) Sure, but with C++ port we can also simplify code, and less code - less bugs. Now cons

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

2016-12-26 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > I for myself have technical reasons why I dislike C++. And I also have Could you, please, provide a list of your dislikes of C++? > concerns about maintainability. Many times the encapsulating breaks > necessary overview. For instance? > So,

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

2016-12-27 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Omari Stephens wrote: > On 12/26/2016 10:37 PM, Alexander Antimonov wrote: >> Is there any plan, enhancement list, users' whishlist? > > There is a bug list, which does have some feature requests as well: > https://github.com/BestImageVie

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2016-12-29 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Josef Kufner wrote: > ... > I think there is a better way, but it would be a bit more complicated > to implement. I wonder if it is a bit too complex for a simple > use-cases. It is called "block programming". It is quite an old idea: > ... > https://josef.kufner.

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

2016-12-29 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Alexander Antimonov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Omari Stephens wrote: >> On 12/26/2016 10:37 PM, Alexander Antimonov wrote: >>> Is there any plan, enhancement list, users' whishlist? >> >> There is a bug list, wh

[Geeqie-devel] Issue #381: "JPEG comment" implementation

2017-01-02 Thread Alexander Antimonov
I have made a patch with support for reading JPEG comment. For now it can be shown in the overlay only. Shall we integrate support for editing and saving JPEG comment and how we'll do that? As there is already "Comment" editbox in the sidebar. Patch is attached to https://github.com/BestImageViewe

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2017-01-21 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > While I also much prefer Geeqie to stay just a viewer, plus maybe a kind > of "shell" for editors [1], I disagree that Linux lacks lightweight > viewers. feh is currently my other favorite. > > [1] > On this topic, would it be interesting to