Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Michael Schumacher
> Von: Frédéric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Le Vendredi 10 Mars 2006 14:10, Michael Schumacher a écrit : > > FYI, the transistion of the GNOME CVS to GNOME SVN is planned for the > > next weekend. Yes, this is the LGM weekend, and yes, this means that we > > might not have easy access to the current so

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Frédéric
Le Vendredi 10 Mars 2006 14:10, Michael Schumacher a écrit : > > GEGL is more than 6 years old. Subversion simply didn't exist at that > > time. GNOME project has no SVN. Believe me, neither chosen programming > > language, nor type of versioning system affect (absense of) > > development of GEGL.

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Michael Schumacher
> Von: "Alexandre Prokoudine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > GEGL is more than 6 years old. Subversion simply didn't exist at that > time. GNOME project has no SVN. Believe me, neither chosen programming > language, nor type of versioning system affect (absense of) > development of GEGL. FYI, the transist

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/10/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Oh, 6 years old. Got it. > > 6 years... I wonder if changing to a higher level language like C++ or > better yet C# (mono has good enough support now) would speed up the > development. I think it would. Mono? Are you kidding? You want pure C application talkin

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Øyvind Kolås
* Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060310 13:53]: > Oh, 6 years old. Got it. > > 6 years... I wonder if changing to a higher level language like C++ or > better yet C# (mono has good enough support now) would speed up the > development. I think it would. > > What do you guys think? The re

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Martin Nordholts
Oh, 6 years old. Got it. 6 years... I wonder if changing to a higher level language like C++ or better yet C# (mono has good enough support now) would speed up the development. I think it would. What do you guys think? From: "Alexandre Prokoudine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gegl-developer@li

Re: [Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/10/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > 2. Why is the old CVS chosen instead of the newer SVN? GEGL is more than 6 years old. Subversion simply didn't exist at that time. GNOME project has no SVN. Believe me, neither chosen programming language, nor type of versioning system affect (absense of) dev

[Gegl-developer] Why C and why CVS?

2006-03-10 Thread Martin Nordholts
Hello! I am a big fan of free software and I really like the GEGL initiative. This way GIMP will have a better chance vs Phothoshop. I do, however, have some questions. 1. Why is C picked as the development language? Isn't C++ THE pick for this kind of library (a typical modular based librar