On 09/15/2010 05:11 PM, Rupert Weber wrote: > And now that double formats exist for all models, shouldn't we consider > deprecating model-to-model conversions alltogether?
ok, scratch that. (I'll just keep talking to myself...) I just found out the hard way what model-to-model conversions are about: 1. They can only be from/to RGBA (that part was easy) 2. For every new model, model-to-model conversions *must* be supplied. Those are the reference conversions which babl assumes to have an error of 0. Replacing those by the respective double format-to-format conversions doesn't work. I'll have to amend the guide accordingly. What I haven't tried yet: What happens if two extensions supply model-to-model conversions for the same format, but with different results? Rupert _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
