2011/6/12 Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com:
So I propose to:
- Create a new gegl-gtk repository, containing the new library
(alternative is to have it as a toplevel in gegl repo, if anyone can
present good arguments for that I don't mind)
First of all, I think the name should be gegl-ui, not
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/12 Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com:
So I propose to:
- Create a new gegl-gtk repository, containing the new library
(alternative is to have it as a toplevel in gegl repo, if anyone can
present good arguments for
2011/6/13 Øyvind Kolås pip...@gimp.org:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, I think the name should be gegl-ui, not gegl-gtk, in
case we want to provide a widget for say Qt.
I support moving the UI stuff into a separate git repository; it
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the same thought, and eventually ended with the same conclusion:
different repos.
I actually started some Qt stuff but realized I get enough of that in
my day-job. So GTK first, then we'll see.
Øyvind: please give
4 matches
Mail list logo