hi,
Nicolas Robidoux schrieb:
Can you (yes, I mean you) think of better names?
uh, what, me?
i wouldn't want to be bothered with choosing different samplers
for up/down-scaling.
So just let me choose from matching pairs of samplers.
You know them better than i do...
greetings,
peter
Øyvind Kolås schrieb:
GEGL should be capable of hosting it's own inspection framework for
the generated images. Although not advertised as such, GeglBuffer
serializes itself to a specified file format structure both for tiled
and linear buffers for any format supported by babl.
i'm not shure
yahvuu schrieb:
Octave is just an example here as it allows very concise implementations.
For linear filters, this boils down to specifying the convolution matrix
and calling a well tested generic filter function - just a couple of lines.
I don't think there will be octave equivalents for each
Hi,
here are some thoughts about a static test framework for gegl operations.
* Functional Tests
These can be as simple as a set of files including a composition,
reference output and a test description. A perl/ruby script feeds the
composition through the gegl binary and compares the output
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is much better to extend GeglBuffer to have an abyss policy, this
means that requests for pixels outside
the define area gets read back as if they were smeared/mirrored (or
like now all 0). After this the gaussian blur
5 matches
Mail list logo
