On 09/14/2010 04:58 PM, Rupert Weber wrote: > Are planar and non-planar versions of one (equally named) format > supposed to coexist?
False alarm as far as I can tell. Sorry about the fuzz. All in all, the planar formats and conversions are still a bit mysterious to me: E.g., how do planar formats and linear conversions go together? And now that double formats exist for all models, shouldn't we consider deprecating model-to-model conversions alltogether? From what I can tell, all they do is save typing " double" twice, for the cost of additional on-the-fly format- and conversion-generation (in fact, a large part of conversion_new()) -- and potential for confusion. Regards Rupert _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
