:
On 07/11/2009 08:14 AM, Henrik Akesson wrote:
Hi,
There are for the moment some discussion as to wheter the code I've
produced should be in the main gimp project or in a separate one.
However, at this point, I feel that it should be under some version
control system, for ease of sharing
Hi,
There are for the moment some discussion as to wheter the code I've
produced should be in the main gimp project or in a separate one.
However, at this point, I feel that it should be under some version
control system, for ease of sharing and security. Thus, I've commited
it to the following
The only dependency there is between the visualisation tool and GEGL
would be the output file format from callgrind.
/Henrik
2009/7/7 Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com:
On 07/07/2009 03:45 PM, Henrik Akesson wrote:
Hi,
the work I've done so far can be split into two parts:
1) gegl
Hi,
the work I've done so far can be split into two parts:
1) gegl scripting - for the moment a ruby script that allows me to run
tests of gegl and some test cases.
2) visualisation tool - a java web project that is made for displaying
performance data.
1) should obviously be commited to the
Hi,
here's the promised evaluation of the current profiling tools and a proposal.
Regards,
Henrik
TOOLS
Valgrind - retained
Oprofile - retained
gprof, sprof - obsoleted by oprofile
ltrace, ptrace - not capable of profiling dynamically loaded objects (dlopen-ed)
GEGL instrumentation - same
Distance 6-11 (6) mean? etc...)
My solution is web based.
I believe that this is enough of differences to justify a new tool. Is
it to you?
Henrik
2009/6/17 Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Henrik Akesson wrote:
I propose to implement a tool that allows the user to (step 1
AFAIK sysprof has a subset of the oprofile functionality, is very
poorly documented and supports only x86 CPUs. This is why I don't plan
on evaluating it.
/Henrik
2009/6/4 Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com:
Henrik Akesson wrote:
This is the moment to let me know for anyone who wants me
I've sent manually and
then in the future I'll make sure that you can do it the git way.
Cheers,
Henrik
2009/4/20 Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com:
Henrik Akesson wrote:
New patch...
Hi Henrik
Could we through IRC arrange me doing a git pull from you through e.g. a
temporarily running
Now split (and no re-introduced commented code, sorry for that):
[gegl_buffer_rename.diff]
Patch from Henrik Akesson that renames pset/pget to
gegl_buffer_pixel_set and gegl_buffer_pixel_get in order to improve
readability of code and to conform to gegl coding standards.
* gegl/buffer/gegl
Here's a patch for:
- Documentation and debug statements added
- Removed needs_visiting from the gegl-visitable interface and the
implementing classes gegl-pad and gegl-node because it was not used
(hardcoded to return TRUE).
- Refactored gegl-eval-mgr field state to use an enumeration instead of
Hi,
here's a small patch on gegl-processor.c
I've kept it very small in order to get some feedback on what I'm doing.
The patch contains:
- comments
- refactoring of the render_rectangle function: extraction of code into a
separate function get_band_size. No functional changes.
- debug
Thank you for the comments, the patch has been updated accordingly.
One question: sometimes I see some methods without the gegl_something_
prefix, does that signify something (like private method)?
Second question: what does BLIT mean?
Henrik
2009/3/12 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org
Hi,
some
The two implementations of GeglVisitable always returns TRUE on calls to
visitable_needs_visiting (see gegl-node:957 and gegl-pad:319).
It is used by gegl-visitor.c, but makes it more difficult to understand the
code.
Can I remove it?
Henrik
___
Hi,
I tend to sprinkle the code with logging statements when learning/debugging.
glib has the appropriate functionality for managing the logs... Normally the
overhead of the logging statements (if turned off) is neglectable.
Should I leave my log statements in my patches (that will be mainly
Hi all,
I'm learning gegl internals for doing some work on parallelizing it (I've
posted before on that subject). When I do it I normally write some
documentation of my own (when it's missing), such as:
http://computerresearcher.blogspot.com/search/label/Gegl
Note that it's fragmented and still
Hi,
This is the first time I write on this list, so I'll introduce myself
briefly:
I've been working/developing for the european space industry for 7
years, but have decided that I want to do SW research, which is why
I'm currently doing a Master (to be followed by a PhD).
During this MSc
16 matches
Mail list logo
