On 10/13/2014 06:36 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
How do you plan to tell when an image is an sRGB image and when it's not
an sRGB image?
The roadmap specifies 24 different formats for sRGB images and 24
additional formats for non-sRGB images.
Presumably the 24 additional formats for non-sRGB
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Elle Stone
ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
You designed an architecture around converting images to unbounded sRGB for
editing.
After 6 months of trying to show you that your architecture has serious
built-in problems, you finally believe me, or at
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Elle Stone
ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
On 10/13/2014 06:36 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
How do you plan to tell when an image is an sRGB image and when it's not
an sRGB image?
The roadmap specifies 24 different formats for sRGB images and 24 additional
On 10/14/2014 06:54 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
So now all chromaticity-dependent editing operations will require a brand
new special specifying, unless the image is already an sRGB image.
If you didn't intend to convert all images to unbounded sRGB for editing,
there wouldn't be any reason to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Elle Stone
ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
The above sentence confuses concepts: The babl architecture might require
that images to be converted to and from unbounded linear gamma sRGB. That
doesn't mean babl is a CMS. And it doesn't mean unbounded linear
On 10/14/2014 07:52 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Elle Stone
ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
To convert images to and from unbounded linear gamma sRGB, you MUST pass
through XYZ. XYZ is the PCS.
I remind you that linear RGB spaces are a single matrix
Hi,
I fully agree with Jehan and think it's essential
in a healthy software development process to scrutinize
and review things. Especially the whole color management
stuff is a topic that is not so clear to many of us and
- with all my respect to Pippin - depending on a
single expert's opinion
