Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

On Feb 1, 2016 12:40 PM, "Sven Claussner" <scl.gp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29.1.2016 at 5:37 PM Daniel Rogers wrote: >> >> * Anyone can do dynamic compilation nowadays with llvm. Imagine >> >> taking the gegl dynamic tree, and compiling it int

Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

On Jan 29, 2016 6:20 AM, "Øyvind Kolås" wrote: > > GEGL is doing single precision 32bit floating point processing for all > operations, thus should not introduce the type of quantization > problems 8bpc/16bpc pipelines introduce for multiple filters - at the > expense of much

Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

Hi Sven, I am confused. What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way in which parallelism is not as possible? -- Daniel On Jan 28, 2016 12:58 PM, "Sven Claussner" wrote: > Hi, > > the