[Gegl-developer] Python-GEGL v0.2 released

2014-06-06 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hello - During this year's LGM, I sprinted on these high-level wrappers for using GEGL through gobject-introspectinf from Python. One can use GEGL from Python without these wrappers - I think Manuel Quinõnes. is doing so in his demonstrations - the wrappers are an effort for having a truly

Re: [Gegl-developer] Support for loading meta-operations from .json now in master

2015-01-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Yay! :-) On 20 January 2015 at 15:08, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, a long standing enhancement[1] in GEGL has been to allow loading meta-operations from a serializable file instead of requiring them to be coded in C. At 31c3 I started working on this, and yesterday it reached a

Re: [Gegl-developer] Returning to python-gegl

2015-02-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
So it looks like the right-thing-to-do now is to add introspection to Babl (otherwise we will need dirty workarounds in gegl). js -- On 12 February 2015 at 21:01, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 February 2015 at 16:30, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br wrote: Otherwise, I think I

[Gegl-developer] Returning to python-gegl

2015-02-12 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi - after several months I am taking back a look at my Python bindings for GEGL, which make use of gobject introspection. The situation with gobject introspection is none but frustrating - maybe one could use it, if he could live in #gobject on irc - but there seens to be no documentation

Re: [Gegl-developer] Returning to python-gegl

2015-02-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 12 February 2015 at 20:50, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 February 2015 at 06:30, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br wrote: Hi - after several months I am taking back a look at my Python bindings for GEGL, which make use of gobject introspection. The situation with gobject

Re: [Gegl-developer] Returning to python-gegl

2015-02-13 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 13 February 2015 at 20:12, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 February 2015 at 01:52, Joao S. O. Bueno I've been looking around, one problem seems to be that since BABL has no introspection, any functions relying on BABL parameters (even just babl formats, which are ordinary C