Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-07-12 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/7/12 Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com: Martin: Can you add gegl-gtk to the continous integration so that distcheck is ran there? Øyvind: Can you add a gegl-gtk component to the gegl product in bugzilla? Or do I need to ask someone else for that? I've created a new job now:

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Nordby
On 13 June 2011 20:38, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: I now have a repo with the code split out. The .pc files need a bit of love, after that it is ready for the first push. I will need someone else to add the gegl-gtk bugzilla component though, but that is secondary. Pushed this to

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-13 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/6/12 Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com: So I propose to: - Create a new gegl-gtk repository, containing the new library (alternative is to have it as a toplevel in gegl repo, if anyone can present good arguments for that I don't mind) First of all, I think the name should be gegl-ui, not

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/6/12 Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com: So I propose to: - Create a new gegl-gtk repository, containing the new library (alternative is to have it as a toplevel in gegl repo, if anyone can present good arguments for

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-13 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/6/13 Øyvind Kolås pip...@gimp.org: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote: First of all, I think the name should be gegl-ui, not gegl-gtk, in case we want to provide a widget for say Qt. I support moving the UI stuff into a separate git repository; it

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-13 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: I had the same thought, and eventually ended with the same conclusion: different repos. I actually started some Qt stuff but realized I get enough of that in my day-job. So GTK first, then we'll see. Øyvind: please give

Re: [Gegl-developer] GEGL and GTK+, a proposal

2011-06-12 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com wrote: (...) So I propose to: - Create a new gegl-gtk repository, containing the new library (alternative is to have it as a toplevel in gegl repo, if anyone can present good arguments for that I don't mind) - Add gegl-gtk