Re: [GEM-dev] HALCON plugin

2010-10-14 Thread cyrille henry
hello, [...] ok, think i have found some problems in my code. if i switch to asynchronous capturing, then i get way better framerates (e.g. 100fps and more; no easy way to really measure this) cool! - latency is worse than expected (see attached feedback image) yes, this is not really

Re: [GEM-dev] HALCON plugin

2010-10-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-30 15:10, cyrille henry wrote: ok, thanks for all the answer. i'm sorry, i was so exited to have it compiled, that i miss the end of the readme. so, i'll not ask how to open a camera, since i now have read it till the end! sending : device GigEVision::0030530f8e64 did not

Re: [GEM-dev] HALCON plugin

2010-09-30 Thread cyrille henry
ok, thanks for all the answer. i'm sorry, i was so exited to have it compiled, that i miss the end of the readme. so, i'll not ask how to open a camera, since i now have read it till the end! sending : device GigEVision::0030530f8e64 did not work, but : device GigEVision:default:0030530f8e64

Re: [GEM-dev] HALCON plugin

2010-09-30 Thread Jack
Very nice ! ;) I hope it will work perfectly soon. ++ Jack Le jeudi 30 septembre 2010 à 15:10 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : ok, thanks for all the answer. i'm sorry, i was so exited to have it compiled, that i miss the end of the readme. so, i'll not ask how to open a camera, since i