Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3636: kvm: Adding details to kvm page fault in x86

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3636/ --- (Updated Oct. 3, 2016, 5:42 a.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3635: gdb: Adds a warning in case gdb is attached multiple times

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/ --- (Updated Oct. 3, 2016, 5:41 a.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3634: gpu-compute: Added method to compute the actual workgroup size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3634/ --- (Updated Oct. 3, 2016, 5:40 a.m.) Review request for Default. Summary (updated)

[gem5-dev] Cron <m5test@zizzer> /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

* build/SPARC/tests/opt/long/fs/80.solaris-boot/sparc/solaris/t1000-simple-atomic: FAILED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/long/se/60.bzip2/alpha/tru64/o3-timing: CHANGED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/01.hello-2T-smt/alpha/linux/o3-timing-mt: passed. *

Re: [gem5-dev] Stable release

I agree with #1. The existence of gem5-stable is just confusing, since we don't have a good process to keep it up-to-date. Steve On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM Beckmann, Brad wrote: > I strongly support 1 as well. > > Brad > > > -Original Message- > From: