mailto:mattdsinclair.w...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: weekly #99
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
Thanks Matt!
I've restarted the Weeklys to ensure it's now
Jason Lowe-Power ; Poremba, Matthew <
> matthew.pore...@amd.com>; vrama...@wisc.edu; Matt Sinclair <
> mattdsinclair.w...@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [gem5-dev] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: weekly #99
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This message originated from an External Source. Use pr
by default though.
-Matt
From: Bobby Bruce
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 7:59 AM
To: The gem5 Developer List
Cc: Jason Lowe-Power ; Poremba, Matthew
; vrama...@wisc.edu; Matt Sinclair
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: weekly #99
Caution: This message originated from
Thanks Matt!
I've restarted the Weeklys to ensure it's now working. Should be complete
over the next day or two.
--
Dr. Bobby R. Bruce
Room 3050,
Kemper Hall, UC Davis
Davis,
CA, 95616
web: https://www.bobbybruce.net
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:48 AM Matt Sinclair via gem5-dev <
The chain for the fixes for weekly is here:
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/67199/1
I have tested that BC gets past the current failure with these 3 fixes
(previously BC failed in an initialization kernel before the first
iteration started, so far with the change it completes
Thanks for quickly digging into this, Matt!
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 1:41 PM Matt Sinclair via gem5-dev
wrote:
> I have confirmed that the Pannotia benchmarks (to my surprise) are using
> AMD's cache bypassing flags for some memory accesses, which Vishnu added
> support for this week. Good thing
I have confirmed that the Pannotia benchmarks (to my surprise) are using
AMD's cache bypassing flags for some memory accesses, which Vishnu added
support for this week. Good thing the support is added now! But that is
why they are failing here -- they hit a corner case Vishnu and I had
Hi Matt P & Vishnu,
It appears something with the GPU support must have broken between your
changes this week -- as far as I can tell all of the nightly tests passed
when you checked in your commits, but something in the more complex
benchmarks (BC in this case) is breaking:
gem5.opt:
