> On May 10, 2016, 1:12 a.m., Joe Gross wrote:
> > Hi Andreas, I had a couple questions/clarifications about this patch. The
> > idea is that this script will run the test/test suites in an ordered
> > fashion but doesn't contain any infrastructure to launch jobs in a
> > distributed
> On May 10, 2016, 1:12 a.m., Joe Gross wrote:
> > Hi Andreas, I had a couple questions/clarifications about this patch. The
> > idea is that this script will run the test/test suites in an ordered
> > fashion but doesn't contain any infrastructure to launch jobs in a
> > distributed
> On May 5, 2016, 8:20 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote:
> > Thanks for the updates. LGTM.
> >
> > If you're willing, I still think it would be good to add comments about
> > what might need to be changed in these files in order to add new tests.
Will do. The way the configuration files are added
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3461/
---
(Updated May 3, 2016, 6:44 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
> On May 2, 2016, 10:01 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote:
> > Overall, this looks pretty solid - much more like a "test harness" than the
> > existing regressions. Thanks!
> >
> > Given that this change is already pretty significant, are there other
> > changes we should introduce or plan to make?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3461/#review8277
---
Overall, this looks pretty solid - much more like a "test harness" than
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3461/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
