---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/#review8765
---
Ship it!
Doesn't look like "gdb" is one of our approved keywords. Maybe
> On Oct. 3, 2016, 12:06 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to just disallow multiple GDB clients to be
> > attached at the same time?
>
> Alexandru Dutu wrote:
> This does not make sense to me as one can run a configuration with
> multiple, different processes.
> On Oct. 3, 2016, 11:06 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to just disallow multiple GDB clients to be
> > attached at the same time?
This does not make sense to me as one can run a configuration with multiple,
different processes. For example: threadContext A will
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/#review8757
---
Wouldn't it make more sense to just disallow multiple GDB clients to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/
---
(Updated Oct. 3, 2016, 5:41 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/#review8756
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brandon Potter
On Sept. 27, 2016, 10:08 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
