Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3684: alpha: Remove ALPHA support and supplemental files

> On Oct. 25, 2016, 10:13 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > util/regress, line 45 > > > > > > I think this has been pointed out by Brad in the past, but we need to > > keep these tests for other Ruby protocols around. I

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3684: alpha: Remove ALPHA support and supplemental files

> On Oct. 25, 2016, 10:13 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > util/regress, line 45 > > > > > > I think this has been pointed out by Brad in the past, but we need to > > keep these tests for other Ruby protocols around. I

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3684: alpha: Remove ALPHA support and supplemental files

> On Oct. 25, 2016, 10:13 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > util/regress, line 45 > > > > > > I think this has been pointed out by Brad in the past, but we need to > > keep these tests for other Ruby protocols around. I

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3684: alpha: Remove ALPHA support and supplemental files

> On Oct. 25, 2016, 10:13 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > SConstruct, line 421 > > > > > > Clearly X86 should be the default, not ARM! ;) > > > > Joking aside, maybe the default should be the same as the host

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3684: alpha: Remove ALPHA support and supplemental files

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3684/#review8976 --- src/cpu/o3/rename_map.cc (line 99)