scons: `build/ALPHA/gem5.debug' is up to date.
scons: `build/ALPHA_MOESI_hammer/gem5.debug' is up to date.
scons: `build/ALPHA_MESI_CMP_directory/gem5.debug' is up to date.
scons: `build/ALPHA_MOESI_CMP_directory/gem5.debug' is up to date.
scons: `build/ALPHA_MOESI_CMP_token/gem5.debug' is up to
Hi Andreas,
Sorry for the extreme delay... this has been hovering near the top of my
to-do list for a while now, but unfortunately has not made it to the top,
in part because it looks like it will not be a quick task. I will bump the
priority and see if I can get it done this week.
Apologies,
On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/#review3186
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marc Orr
On July 22, 2012, 5:29 p.m., Steve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 11:22 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Summary (updated)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 11:31 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 1:48 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 2:37 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/#review3187
---
src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 4:10 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Description
On Aug. 1, 2012, 3:51 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc, line 71
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1221/diff/7/?file=28379#file28379line71
Looks like this should be stateQueueL1
Fixed, don't know how that changed from the previous version of the patch.
On Aug. 1,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1288/#review3189
---
I was trying to run the following command --
./build/X86/gem5.fast
On Aug. 1, 2012, 3:51 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
does you comment about the kernel mean that the simulator is ok, but the kernel
panics when you're switching?
On Aug. 1, 2012, 3:51 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc, line 89
On Aug. 1, 2012, 3:51 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
Ali Saidi wrote:
does you comment about the kernel mean that the simulator is ok, but the
kernel panics when you're switching?
Yes. The simulator continues switching back-and-forth, printing out panics and
stacktraces etc., until the
Hi Nilay,
I suspect I won’t have a chance to look at it for a while, but I believe you
have an expert right there in Madison. Jason should know that patch well, so
hopefully he can help. If I had to guess, I suspect that the problem involves
specifying the num-dir to be greater than 1. We
17 matches
Mail list logo
