ndreas
>> Sandberg
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 3:35 AM
>> To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>; Gabe Black <
>> gabebl...@google.com>
>> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT] Re: testing framework
>>
>> One issue that is preventing me from
Original Message-
> From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Andreas
> Sandberg
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 3:35 AM
> To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>; Gabe Black <
> gabebl...@google.com>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT
Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>; Gabe Black <gabebl...@google.com>
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT] Re: testing framework
One issue that is preventing me from running the unit tests is that they
require separate scons targets. One solution that I was considering at one
point was to make th
ssions will contain unit tests.
Regards,
Brandon
-Original Message-
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Jason
Lowe-Power
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:22 AM
To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT] Re: testing framew
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:22 AM
> To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT] Re: testing framework
>
> I'm all for unit tests. GTest seems fine, but I'm not a huge fan of its
> syntax. Although, that shouldn't stop us from having unit test
will contain
unit tests.
Regards,
Brandon
-Original Message-
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Jason Lowe-Power
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:22 AM
To: gem5 Developer List <gem5-dev@gem5.org>
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] [EXT] Re: testing framework
I
I'm all for unit tests. GTest seems fine, but I'm not a huge fan of its
syntax. Although, that shouldn't stop us from having unit tests!!
What's the state of getting whimsy pushed in? From my side, it's ready to
go. The only thing on my to do list that I would have liked to finish up
before
Even without the complexities of setting up SystemC+gem5 it's pretty painful to
"unit" test SystemC because the SystemC runtime has a lot of global state that
comes along with it (for example: you can't "uncall" sc_start() to go back and
re-do elaboration with different modules). The only (not
