---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2646/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 5:48 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
On Feb. 7, 2015, 6:14 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Awesome! This lack of separate channels for requests responses has
bugged me for years, I'm really glad to see it addressed.
One minor suggestion: to me, terms like recvRetryReq and recvRetryResp seem
backward, since 'retry' is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2646/#review5867
---
Awesome! This lack of separate channels for requests responses has
On Feb. 7, 2015, 10:14 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Awesome! This lack of separate channels for requests responses has
bugged me for years, I'm really glad to see it addressed.
One minor suggestion: to me, terms like recvRetryReq and recvRetryResp seem
backward, since 'retry' is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2646/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
