* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing passed.
*
I'm back in Ann Arbor waiting for my brother's surgery and I haven't had
a chance to go back and get my desktop to work from, so I'm fiddling
around with trying to get this to work. What I'm thinking to do is
basically to just make the places I stick BIOS tables reserved and
everything else up to
That turns on the output in the trace printing code, but it can't print
what it doesn't have. ExecResult is turned on with Exec so I've been
using it. That makes sense because it's been printing for loads, just
not for stores. Thanks, but it looks like the original question still
stands.
Gabe
I'm not clear on exactly what you're doing here. Why is the area
reserved? Are you talking about physical memory on the host? Why do
you need to enumerate children? Details...
Nate
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Gabe Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm back in Ann Arbor waiting for my
I'm guessing the answer is no.
Nate
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Gabe Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That turns on the output in the trace printing code, but it can't print
what it doesn't have. ExecResult is turned on with Exec so I've been
using it. That makes sense because it's been
Basically, the e820 map is to tell the OS what areas of memory it can
use and what areas hold the BIOS itself and the data tables it needs to
operate. There are some areas in higher addresses which I'm not sure
what they're for, but I suspect it's something to do with PCI devices or
bridges or
The reason I'd want to enumerate children is so I can find any memory
objects below the CPU and determine what available ranges I can add into
the map. If there ends up being in-memory-system address transformation
in the future that could be more complicated, but for now just getting a
Yea, sounds like a bug to me.
Steve
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:55 AM, nathan binkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing the answer is no.
Nate
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Gabe Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That turns on the output in the trace printing code, but it can't print
