It won't work unless you at some point explicitly enabled web access
for that repository on daystrom.
Nate
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gabriel Michael Black
wrote:
> I can't verify that it will work right now, but you should be able to
> clone it like you would clone M5; with http: instea
I can't really look at the code at the moment, but from the
description it should be fine.
Gabe
Quoting Ali Saidi :
> Great... Gabe, are you satisfied?
>
> Ali
>
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:00 AM, soumyaroop roy wrote:
>
>> Hi Gabe, Ali,
>>
>> Updated patch(es) are here:
>> http://www.csee.usf.edu
Great... Gabe, are you satisfied?
Ali
On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:00 AM, soumyaroop roy wrote:
> Hi Gabe, Ali,
>
> Updated patch(es) are here:
> http://www.csee.usf.edu/~sroy/techres/m5res/m5_alpha_cix_mvi.tar.bz2
>
> I folded earlier patches 'alpha_mvi.patch' and
> 'alpha_cix_ctpop.patch' into a
>
I can't verify that it will work right now, but you should be able to
clone it like you would clone M5; with http: instead of ssh: and no h...@.
Gabe
Quoting soumyaroop roy :
> I tried pulling them using 'hg pull ssh://h...@m5sim.org/arm-patches'.
> Where should I clone them from?
>
> -Soumyar
I tried pulling them using 'hg pull ssh://h...@m5sim.org/arm-patches'.
Where should I clone them from?
-Soumyaroop
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
> That could be but it wasn't the intention. Did you try cloning them over
> http?
>
> Gabe
>
> soumyaroop roy wrote:
>> Hey Gabe,
That could be but it wasn't the intention. Did you try cloning them over
http?
Gabe
soumyaroop roy wrote:
> Hey Gabe, do only certain people have access to the arm patches?
>
> -S
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gabe Black wrote:
>
>>Hi everybody. Rather than blowing out your inboxes
Hey Gabe, do only certain people have access to the arm patches?
-S
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gabe Black wrote:
> Hi everybody. Rather than blowing out your inboxes with 90 patches,
> please pull my patch queue from ssh://h...@m5sim.org/arm-patches.
> Everything is included except the
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:08:05 -, Kevin Lim wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> When I originally wrote the branch predictor code, I had hoped to make
> it a flexible object that could be used across multiple CPUs. At the
> same time I had the exact same conflict you're mentioning -- it seemed
> to be overkil
Thanks Kevin. No problem for the delay. I'll update the stats with this
new patch and then push it. Hopefully that will be in the next couple of
days but possibly not til later on.
Cheers
Tim
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:44:45 -, Kevin Lim wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Sorry for the slow reply, it'
