Re: [m5-dev] Compiling Bug

2009-01-11 Thread Rick Strong
I have committed the original change. Let me know if there is a problem Best, -Rick gbl...@eecs.umich.edu wrote: Sorry for not responding sooner. I thought Rick was going to commit his change. This is the bit of code that traces the macroop on request. For that to happen, ExecMacro needs

Re: [m5-dev] Compiling Bug

2009-01-08 Thread gblack
I think your change is right, but just in case could you please try tracing with different combinations of turning on and explicitly off Exec, ExecMicro, and ExecMacro? I sent an email recently which talked about how the new options work. My compiler must not have that warning, but I have seen

Re: [m5-dev] Compiling Bug

2009-01-08 Thread nathan binkert
It's a warning that was introduced with gcc 4.3, and we have warnings cause errors. When I ported the tree to gcc 4.3, I chose to keep the warning (there was some debate) because we're supporting so many users now that some of them might not be so savvy on the particulars of operator precedence.