Re: [m5-dev] SPARC_SE hook up a few more syscalls

2009-09-16 Thread nathan binkert
Not as far as I know, and no. Looking at this code generally, it would be nice to move the common definitions into a generic base class rather than have 32 bit SPARC inherit from 64 bit SPARC, but that's outside the scope of this patch. In general, there is a lot of repetition in the syscall

Re: [m5-dev] SPARC_SE hook up a few more syscalls

2009-09-15 Thread Gabe Black
Not as far as I know, and no. Looking at this code generally, it would be nice to move the common definitions into a generic base class rather than have 32 bit SPARC inherit from 64 bit SPARC, but that's outside the scope of this patch. Gabe nathan binkert wrote: Did anyone ever import this

Re: [m5-dev] SPARC_SE hook up a few more syscalls

2009-09-13 Thread nathan binkert
Did anyone ever import this code? If not, anyone see any reason not to? On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hello I'm trying to run gcc from spec2k under SPARC_SE and ran into a few unimplemented syscalls.  Attached is a patch that enables getrlimit and

[m5-dev] SPARC_SE hook up a few more syscalls

2009-07-29 Thread Vince Weaver
Hello I'm trying to run gcc from spec2k under SPARC_SE and ran into a few unimplemented syscalls. Attached is a patch that enables getrlimit and getrusage and sets setrlimit to be ignored. The code is modeled on the Alpha code and seems to work. gcc.spec2k still doesn't work though. On