(Is there a reason we're not having this conversation on m5-dev? I
moved it back there for posterity, and in case anyone else wants to
chime in. Note that we're discussing better processing of the C++
code snippets in the ISA description language.)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Gabe
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Gabriel Michael
Blackgbl...@eecs.umich.edu wrote:
Quoting Steve Reinhardt ste...@gmail.com:
- Pass by reference operands should also just be flagged as errors,
since there's no way to know if the operand is read, written, or both.
It's more difficult than
Good point... if we wanted to be completely safe we'd either have to
require a prototype to be in scope or forbid using instruction
operands directly as function call operands altogether.
I feel like I can probably help with some useful ideas, but I don't
have a good enough picture of what's
nathan binkert wrote:
Good point... if we wanted to be completely safe we'd either have to
require a prototype to be in scope or forbid using instruction
operands directly as function call operands altogether.
I feel like I can probably help with some useful ideas, but I don't
have a