Does anyone have an opinion on which is better? I'd like to do use the
first approach, but I'm not sure it's worth the complexity.
Seems like growing down shouldn't add much complexity. It may even
solve other sorts of problems.
Nate
___
m5-dev
While thinking about it as I waited for a response I decided the same
thing. I'll implement that when I get a chance.
Gabe
Quoting nathan binkert n...@binkert.org:
Does anyone have an opinion on which is better? I'd like to do use the
first approach, but I'm not sure it's worth the
Vince Weaver wrote:
some more info on mmap locations.
I ran some tests on a lot of machines, and only then thought to look
things up. It looks like the grow-top-down was introduced on Linux 2.6.9,
at least for x86: http://lwn.net/Articles/91829/
In any case, what follows are results from
This value was actually based off how Linux set up an actual process on
a real machine. We have a tool that runs processes on a real machine and
compares their execution with M5. I calibrated those constants to make
the execution match exactly all the way through. That said, there might
be
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Gabe Black wrote:
This value was actually based off how Linux set up an actual process on
a real machine. We have a tool that runs processes on a real machine and
compares their execution with M5. I calibrated those constants to make
the execution match exactly all the
Quoting Vince Weaver vi...@csl.cornell.edu:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Gabe Black wrote:
This value was actually based off how Linux set up an actual process on
a real machine. We have a tool that runs processes on a real machine and
compares their execution with M5. I calibrated those constants to
