* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/inorder-timing
passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing-ruby
passed.
*
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/244/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Debug: Implement getArgument() and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/245/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
ARM: Implement functional virtual to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/246/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
ARM: Implement a CLCD Frame buffer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/249/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
ARM: Add a Keyboard Mouse Interface
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/250/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
imported patch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/251/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
ARM: Make the TLB a little bit faster
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/243/#review346
---
Nothing obviously wrong.
- Nathan
On 2010-09-16 00:46:31, Ali Saidi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/245/#review348
---
Don't see any problems.
src/arch/arm/vtophys.cc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/246/#review349
---
Overall, this diff looks fine. There are numerous little style
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/248/#review350
---
Given that the bugs were subtle, can you explain what they were in a
Out of curiosity, did you accidentally submit the same patch for
review twice and then delete one? This diff is not found.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Ali Saidi sa...@umich.edu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/249/#review351
---
looks reasonable, but it needs a quick style pass.
src/dev/arm/kmi.cc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/251/#review352
---
Looks fine, but this seems like a functional change, is it not? Is that
On 2010-09-16 06:18:18, Nathan Binkert wrote:
Looks fine, but this seems like a functional change, is it not? Is that
OK? Is that what you expected?
yes, it is, I'm fine with it.
- Ali
---
This is an automatically generated
Hi guys,
I am using swig 1.3.40, so per Nate's note in the last changeset, I don't
think that should be an issue.
@Steve: Thanks for the pointer to 'bisect'. Also, in debugging this
problem, I ran into the same MC146818 checkpointing/drain bug from before.
Previously, I had written a patch to
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Joel Hestness hestn...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
Hi guys,
I am using swig 1.3.40, so per Nate's note in the last changeset, I don't
think that should be an issue.
@Steve: Thanks for the pointer to 'bisect'. Also, in debugging this
problem, I ran into the same
17 matches
Mail list logo