On 9 Jun 2011, at 00:10, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:28, Nilay Vaish wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On
On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:28, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:09, Nilay Vaish wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
>>>
>>>> When you declare your function p
On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:09, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
>
>> When you declare your function private, you can't use instance.function() to
>> access it. Is it generating a compile time error?
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2011, at 00:31, Nila
Why not just let TraceFlags be interpreted as DebugFlags, so TraceFlags still
works for users.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 02:08, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> changeset 9228e00459d4 in /z/repo/m5
> details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=9228e00459d4
> description:
> scons: rename TraceFlags
When you declare your function private, you can't use instance.function() to
access it. Is it generating a compile time error?
On 8 Jun 2011, at 00:31, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> Consider the following class declarations --
>
> class A
> {
> public:
>virtual void function() = 0;
> };
>
> class
On 12 May 2011, at 04:24, Nathan Binkert wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/690/#review1226
> ---
>
>
> I guess
