On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:09, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
When you declare your function private, you can't use instance.function() to
access it. Is it generating a compile time error?
On 8 Jun 2011, at 00:31, Nilay Vaish wrote:
Consider the following class
On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:28, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:09, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
When you declare your function private, you can't use instance.function()
to access it. Is it generating
On 9 Jun 2011, at 00:10, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:28, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:09, Nilay Vaish wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jack Harvard wrote:
When you declare your
When you declare your function private, you can't use instance.function() to
access it. Is it generating a compile time error?
On 8 Jun 2011, at 00:31, Nilay Vaish wrote:
Consider the following class declarations --
class A
{
public:
virtual void function() = 0;
};
class B :
Why not just let TraceFlags be interpreted as DebugFlags, so TraceFlags still
works for users.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 02:08, Nathan Binkert wrote:
changeset 9228e00459d4 in /z/repo/m5
details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=9228e00459d4
description:
scons: rename TraceFlags to
On 12 May 2011, at 04:24, Nathan Binkert wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/690/#review1226
---
I guess I
