* build/SPARC_SE/tests/opt/long/70.twolf/sparc/linux/simple-atomic FAILED! * build/SPARC_SE/tests/opt/long/50.vortex/sparc/linux/simple-timing FAILED! * build/SPARC_SE/tests/opt/long/10.mcf/sparc/linux/simple-timing FAILED! *
Looks like I still got some work to do w/the SPARC regressions. I definitely didnt think adding a few control flags would cause pain, but I must've unknowingly hit some other spot in the code since control flags should have nothing to do with how the simple cpus operate. On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at
ok, looks like these sparc runs are just regression updates that I didnt do for the long runs (phew!). I'll update them shortly. On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Korey Sewell ksew...@umich.edu wrote: Looks like I still got some work to do w/the SPARC regressions. I definitely didnt think
See /z/m5/regression/regress-2011-06-05-03:00:01 for details. ___ gem5-dev mailing list email@example.com http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
My fault... I moved the repo URL from m5 to gem5 and the regression script couldn't find it anymore. I'm re-running now. Steve On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Cron Daemon r...@zizzer.eecs.umich.edu wrote: See /z/m5/regression/regress-2011-06-05-03:00:01 for details.
scons: *** Found dependency cycle(s): * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-timing-mp passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/01.hello-2T-smt/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed. *
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/01.hello-2T-smt/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-atomic passed. *