On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Korey Sewell ksew...@umich.edu wrote:
A few quick points from reading Steve's email:
- O wow, I just realized I got mixed up in saying that the O3
ExecContext is a thread context instead of a dyninst...my bad!...I
guess my point is that I would like to see
I know nobody likes to read looong emails so I'll try to help in splitting
this up this email into 2 parts:
1. Comments on Gabe's idea
2. My proposed solution
=== Comments on Gabe's Idea ===
From what I gather from Gabe's writeup, I would say the quick/dirty of what
Gabe wants to do is decouple
Thanks for the ideas, Korey. I agree that using our existing objects better
(defining what they really represent and then using them consistently
according to those definitions) should be a central part of whatever we do.
2009/2/17 Korey Sewell ksew...@umich.edu
While I do see Gabe's points
