I want to move the minimum SCons version forward. Currently, the
minimum is 0.96.91 which has a bunch of warts which are annoying.
Does anyone have a reason for me not to move to 0.98.0? Should I move
it even further forward?
There's always scons-local if people don't have local
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 2:09 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
I want to move the minimum SCons version forward. Currently, the
minimum is 0.96.91 which has a bunch of warts which are annoying.
Does anyone have a reason for me not to
How new can a distro be and still not have 0.98? I realize there's
probably a big range, but what's a reasonable approximation?
Gabe
Quoting Ali Saidi sa...@umich.edu:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 2:09 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Sigh. Alright, here goes.
I'm trying to significantly improve the build framework and there is a
lot that has improved in scons with respect to our minimum version.
More specifically, I've figured out how to reduce both the null
Thank you. To me that sounds worth it. Although a page describing
scons-local perhaps linked to the EnusreScons() check would be a
necessity.
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 4:20 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Sigh. Alright, here goes.
Thank you. To me that sounds worth it. Although a page describing
scons-local perhaps linked to the EnusreScons() check would be a
necessity.
That's exactly what I'd do.
Nate
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
