[gem5-dev] Cron <m5test@zizzer> /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing-ruby: passed. *

Re: [gem5-dev] Potential bugs in GEM5, x86

Hello, I have a solution for the second problem. Please find it below, as it might help someone: - First problem, host system was 32bit and the img was 64 bit. - Once I compiled the application on 64bit Linux, the system complained that the kernel version on img is too old compared to the one

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3502: mem: Split the hit_latency into tag_latency and data_latency

> On July 27, 2016, 4:52 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.hh, line 228 > > > > > > Could you add a comment here? > > > > It seems to me this code is not right, as it checks if the

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3550: ruby: rename networktest to garnet_synthetic_traffic.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3550/#review8685 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jieming Yin On Aug. 24, 2016, 3:20 p.m., Tushar

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3555: config: make internal links in network topology unidirectional.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3555/#review8687 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jieming Yin On Aug. 24, 2016, 3:22 p.m., Tushar

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3554: config: add a separate config file for the network.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3554/#review8686 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jieming Yin On Aug. 24, 2016, 3:22 p.m., Tushar

Re: [gem5-dev] X86 RSP return address (after MemWrite) not yet updated issue?

Hi Bjoern, Did you ever solve this issue? I see what you're describing, but it's not obvious to me what causes the problem. Thanks, Brandon -Original Message- From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:08 AM To: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] X86 RSP return address (after MemWrite) not yet updated issue?

Hi all, Two thoughts: 1. Does X86 + o3 + classic memory system actually work? 2. The interleaving of “real” timing accesses and the functional “debug” accesses is not well defined. In general I would encourage to not assume anything. If you are indeed using classic (see 1), then I think I know

Re: [gem5-dev] Fault handling issue

Hi Brad and Bjoern, I apologize for taking long to answer. I had the thread bypass my inbox, and I did not see the responses... Wrt evictionCallback, honestly, I do not understand it very well and I think it would not suit my needs (but that's because my architecture is indeed fairly