The following debug trace tells us the "getOffset(pkt->getAddr()) +
pkt->getSize() <= RubySystem::getBlockSizeBytes()". Why does this exception
happen? Do you give me some hints I can continue to dig in this error? Thank
you.
1428070516000: system.ruby.tcp_cntrl2.coalescer.slave0:
Matt,
1. This error occurs in DeepBench RNN LSTM app.
2. The (hidden size, batch size, time step) is (256, 1, 1), (512, 1, 1), and
(1024, 1, 1)
3. This error happens in MIOpenGEMM "miog_alphaab" kernel
4. I don't think this error caused by atomic operation, but I can check.
Tsung
Hi Tsung,
In general this error happens when a memory request is trying to issue a
request that spans multiple cache lines. From the line you included, it
appears that this is the case. I thought I'd added the appropriate support
for uncoalesced accesses that should resolve this problem, but
Hi All,
I am facing compile issues while trying to compile
commit e02ec0c24d56bce4a0d8636a340e15cd223d1930 .
There are two types of errors in the Gem5 source:
(1) *no matching function for call to : find(uint64_t&)*
build/HSAIL_X86/gpu-compute/hsail_code.cc: In member function
'StorageElement*
Tony,
This SDWA instruction causes this Ruby error. Please check if there is a fix
for this error and please check it in publicly. Thank you.
Tsung Tai
arch/gcn3/insts/inst_util.hh:599: T Gcn3ISA::sdwaInstSrcImpl_helper(T, T,
SDWASelVals, bool) [with T = unsigned int]: Assertion
Hello Anthony Gutierrez, Jason Lowe-Power, Brandon Potter,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/4423
to look at the new patch set (#17).
Change subject: tests: Add test for the m5-exit instruction.
Sean Wilson has uploaded a new patch set (#8) to the change originally
created by Jason Lowe-Power. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/10121 )
Change subject: tests: Add explicit build test
..
tests: Add
Hello Anthony Gutierrez, Jason Lowe-Power, Brandon Potter,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/4422
to look at the new patch set (#17).
Change subject: tests: Add a simple example test
Sean Wilson has uploaded a new patch set (#17) to the change originally
created by Jason Lowe-Power. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/4882 )
Change subject: tests: Add documentation for new testing code
Hello Gabe Black, Anthony Gutierrez, Jason Lowe-Power, Giacomo Travaglini,
Andreas Sandberg,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/4421
to look at the new patch set (#16).
Change subject: tests,ext: Add a new testing
Hi Tsung,
That helper function is actually used by all vector instructions that have
SDWA support, so posting the error function does not tell us which specific
instruction is causing the failure. We would need a gdb backtrace for
that. However, I don't think getting a gdb backtrace is the
*
build/RISCV/tests/opt/quick/se/02.insttest/riscv/linux-rv64c/minor-timing:
FAILED!
* build/RISCV/tests/opt/quick/se/02.insttest/riscv/linux-rv64c/o3-timing:
FAILED!
*
build/RISCV/tests/opt/quick/se/02.insttest/riscv/linux-rv64c/simple-atomic:
FAILED!
*
Hello Gabe Black, Daniel Carvalho, Jason Lowe-Power, Nikos Nikoleris,
Andreas Sandberg,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/11970
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: mem: Add a QoS-aware Memory Controller
Hello Gabe Black, Daniel Carvalho, Jason Lowe-Power, Nikos Nikoleris,
Andreas Sandberg,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/11970
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: mem: Add a QoS-aware Memory Controller
14 matches
Mail list logo
