[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: system-arm: bigLITTLE with VExpress_GEM5_V2 in dtb

2020-01-14 Thread Giacomo Travaglini (Gerrit)
Giacomo Travaglini has submitted this change. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24083 ) Change subject: system-arm: bigLITTLE with VExpress_GEM5_V2 in dtb .. system-arm: bigLITTLE with VExpress_GEM5_V2 in

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 50.vortex tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24387 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 50.vortex tests .. tests: Removed 50.vortex tests In an effort to cleanup the

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 70.twolf tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24383 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 70.twolf tests .. tests: Removed 70.twolf tests In an effort to cleanup the

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 40.perlbmk tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24403 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 40.perlbmk tests .. tests: Removed 40.perlbmk tests In an effort to cleanup

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 20.parser tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24384 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 20.parser tests .. tests: Removed 20.parser tests In an effort to cleanup the

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 60.bzip2 tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24385 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 60.bzip2 tests .. tests: Removed 60.bzip2 tests In an effort to cleanup the

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed 30.eon tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24386 ) Change subject: tests: Removed 30.eon tests .. tests: Removed 30.eon tests In an effort to cleanup the old

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: tests: Removed the old ALPHA tests

2020-01-14 Thread Bobby R. Bruce (Gerrit)
Bobby R. Bruce has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24388 ) Change subject: tests: Removed the old ALPHA tests .. tests: Removed the old ALPHA tests Jira:

Re: [gem5-dev] Stop checkpointing ARM TLB state

2020-01-14 Thread Gabe Black
Ok, thanks. I'll put together a CL removing the checkpointing. It should be backwards compatible with old checkpoints still since new versions of gem5 will just ignore the extra state in the checkpoint. Gabe On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:37 AM Giacomo Travaglini < giacomo.travagl...@arm.com> wrote:

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: arm: Remove checkpointing from the ARM TLBs.

2020-01-14 Thread Gabe Black (Gerrit)
Gabe Black has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24389 ) Change subject: arm: Remove checkpointing from the ARM TLBs. .. arm: Remove checkpointing from the ARM TLBs. All

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: arm: Don't checkpoint the SystemCounter's "_period" value.

2020-01-14 Thread Gabe Black (Gerrit)
Gabe Black has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24390 ) Change subject: arm: Don't checkpoint the SystemCounter's "_period" value. .. arm: Don't checkpoint the

Re: [gem5-dev] Stop checkpointing ARM TLB state

2020-01-14 Thread Giacomo Travaglini
Hi Gabe, you are definitely right. The only reason I could think of about why we are checkpointing TLB entries is because we want to be able to restore the TLB in a wam state. In theory you could get away with it in FM by instantiating an empty TLB which is saving invalid entries (when

[gem5-dev] The memory dependence predictor misses dependencies following fences

2020-01-14 Thread ASHKAN ASGHARZADEH DONIGHI
Hi Everybody, We are working on Atomic instructions in X86 ISA and how they are handled by gem5. During running a simple benchmark which executes an Atomic_Increment within a loop for 1M iterations, we have encountered 2 MILLION TIMES OF MEMORY_ORDER_VIOLATIONS which results in 2

[gem5-dev] Change in gem5/gem5[master]: mem-ruby: Minor Ruby Prefetcher fixes

2020-01-14 Thread Giacomo Travaglini (Gerrit)
Hello Timothy Hayes, I'd like you to do a code review. Please visit https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24363 to review the following change. Change subject: mem-ruby: Minor Ruby Prefetcher fixes ..