Re: [gem5-users] 回复： Installing Shared Libraries to Image in Full Simulation

Hi, This is the i got in past when I was trying to run SPEC in SE mode If you check mailing list there are suggestions about it I have not yet ported the spec 2017 to gem5, I was trying to use FS but then I saw that 03 CPU in gem5art shows unsuccessful I am planning to port spec benchmarks in

[gem5-users] ?????? Installing Shared Libraries to Image in Full Simulation

HiAbhishek, I am running the spec 2017 in the gem5 simulator(X86). But a lot of benchmarks didnt works. It shown tha : warn:instruction 'movntdq_Mo_Vo' unimplemented. So,what I do for it? And anyone can tell me how to deal with it? Thank you.

Re: [gem5-users] Changing the "inParallelMode"

Hi Yuchen, As far as I know, it is not going to be possible to use this for other cpu models with small change/changes. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:04 AM YUCHEN ZHOU wrote: > Thanks, Ayaz. So if it is possible to change some code to support other > CPU models? > > > Best regards, > > Yuchen > >

Re: [gem5-users] Installing Shared Libraries to Image in Full Simulation

Hi Abhishek, I will suggest you do the same as Muhammet did. And let us know if you still see the error. -Ayaz On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:14 PM Muhammet Abdullah Soytürk < muhammetabdullahsoyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Abhishek , > > Can you run it with PACKER_LOG=1 as suggested? The output may

Re: [gem5-users] Installing Shared Libraries to Image in Full Simulation

Hi Abhishek , Can you run it with PACKER_LOG=1 as suggested? The output may help to solve the problem. I remember that I was also having a similar problem. I found the solution by adding my user to the kvm group or running with sudo. That might also be the case for you. Best, Muhammet Abhishek

Re: [gem5-users] Installing Shared Libraries to Image in Full Simulation

Hi Ayaz, I am using gem5art to get spec 2017 installed in the image. I am at this "Building the Disk Image" step When I use this command "./packer build spec2017/spec2017.json" I get the following error: qemu output will be in this color. ==> qemu: Retrieving ISO ==> qemu: Trying

[gem5-users] [ARM se Ruby] Page fault with SPEC CPU 2006 for ARM ISA

Hi, I'm trying to execute the SPEC CPU 2006 benchmark on multicore, ARM, se. However I'm having this problem:    panic: Page table fault when accessing virtual address 0x11 So far, I have read that the problem may come from the cross-compiling of the SPEC benchmarks. Any hint in which

Re: [gem5-users] how to Run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs

One Buildroot option: - https://cirosantilli.com/linux-kernel-module-cheat/#gem5-buildroot-setup-getting-started - https://cirosantilli.com/linux-kernel-module-cheat/#add-new-files-to-the-buildroot-image On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 5:50 PM FARIDEH ZIAEE wrote: > > Hi, > I need to run spec cpu

Re: [gem5-users] how to Run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs

Hi, Follow this https://gem5art.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:50 PM FARIDEH ZIAEE wrote: > Hi, > I need to run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs mode but I don't know how to run it. > also ,according to site"" > https://yulistic.gitlab.io/2016/05/gem5-make-a-new-boot-image/"; I

[gem5-users] how to Run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs

Hi, I need to run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs mode but I don't know how to run it. also ,according to site"" https://yulistic.gitlab.io/2016/05/gem5-make-a-new-boot-image/"; I make a new boot image : d if=/dev/zero of=ubuntu.img bs=1M count=12288 ls -alh fdisk -l ubuntu.img sudo fdisk

[gem5-users] how to Run spec cpu 2066 on gem5-Fs

Hi, I need to run spec cpu 2006 on gem5-Fs mode but I don't know how to run it. also ,according to site"" https://yulistic.gitlab.io/2016/05/gem5-make-a-new-boot-image/"; I make a new boot image : d if=/dev/zero of=ubuntu.img bs=1M count=12288 ls -alh fdisk -l ubuntu.img sudo fdisk

Re: [gem5-users] Commit numbers/tags of previous stable version missing

Hi Abhishek, In the relatively distant past (e.g., 6+ years ago), we marked a few commits with "stable" tags. However, these commits were no more stable than any other. It was completely arbitrary. I would not trust these commits any more than any other random commit 6 years ago. At that time,

Re: [gem5-users] Modifying source code in gem5

Make sure you activate the 'option' for executing with O3 cpu:    --cpu-type=DerivO3CPU Carlos On 1/3/20 10:27, Eun-Sung Kim wrote: I’m trying to modify source code in gem5. For testing, I add a cprintf() statement to src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh. Then using scons, I rebuild gem5. But, any

[gem5-users] How to simulate the bus invert method between L2cache to L1D Cache ?

I want to simulate the bus invert method between L2cache to L1D Cache. But Learning-gem5 or tutorial is not supported this. Through Commmonitor, I can trace the bus between L2Cache and L1DCache, but did not know how to apply the bus invert method. can you tell me which part modified for

Re: [gem5-users] Changing the "inParallelMode"

Thanks, Abhishek. I have read this website before. In current gem5, the source code is somewhat different from the code wrote in the link. I am curious about the current progress of this work. Best regards, Yuchen -原始邮件- 发件人:"Abhishek Singh" 发送时间:2020-03-01 15:28:31 (星期日) 收件人:

Re: [gem5-users] Changing the "inParallelMode"

Thanks, Ayaz. So if it is possible to change some code to support other CPU models? Best regards, Yuchen -原始邮件- 发件人:"Ayaz Akram" 发送时间:2020-03-01 15:54:03 (星期日) 收件人: "gem5 users mailing list" 抄送: m5-us...@m5sim.org 主题: Re: [gem5-users] Changing the "inParallelMode" Hi Yuchen,

Re: [gem5-users] Kernel for x64

Thanks Muhammet, your tutorial link definitely helped. We got it working with Kernel 5.2.3 and 5.4.21 On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:48 PM Muhammet Abdullah Soytürk < muhammetabdullahsoyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Niranjan, > > You can check this >

Re: [gem5-users] Changing CPU type

Thanks Abhishek. From your version that you pointed on, it seems to work. We got it working with the latest version On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:25 PM Abhishek Singh < abhishek.singh199...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What commit are you using? > > > I got option 1 working on commit