Hello All,
I am trying to model a deeper O3 pipeline as suggested in
https://gem5-users.gem5.narkive.com/LNMJQ1M5/model-deeper-pipeline-in-x86
but I keep running into some assertion failures related to the time buffers
and skid buffers even though that patch mentioned in the previous link is
Hi Soramichi,
If you're in SE mode, you can call the function "map(Addr vaddr, Addr
paddr, int sz, bool cacheable=true);" on the process object from Python.
For instance:
```
# Default to running 'hello', use the compiled ISA to find the binary
# grab the specific path to the binary
thispath =
Hi Eliot,
thanks for the advice. The component (class) I'm looking for is the one that
uses
the page table walker (which uses TLB inside) to convert a vaddr to a paddr.
What I want to do is to modify a given virtual address to a different address
if it is in
a specific range, to mimic memory
Dear Users I have a problem with X86 full system simulation.
I first set the environment variables and then run the FS mode as follows
and get the following error.
%%===
./build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py
I don't use the latest version of Gem5, and have focused on an ARM simulator, but I see no reason
why the operation would not be generally the same as the version I am using.
In src/sim there is a base TLB class in tlb.{hh,cc}, and
src/arch/x86/tlb.{hh,cc} extend
this. There is also a table
Hi,
I checked the latest code on github and found that vtophys() was indeed not
used and removed recently.
Best,
Soramichi
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:24:43 +0900
Soramichi Akiyama via gem5-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find a component that receives a virtual address and returns
> the
Hi,
I am trying to find a component that receives a virtual address and returns
the corresponding physical address (converted using pagetable_walker) in x86.
vtophys() in arch/x86/vtophys.cc does exactly what I'm looking for, but the
thing
is that this function seems to be never called by
Hi All,
I am using Gem5 to replay memory traces generated from the QEMU simulator,
but the memory traces contains all virtual addresses of a guest VM, and the
`traffic_gen` in Gem5 works with physical addresses.
Does gem5 have a similar tool like `traffic_gen` to replay memory traces
with
